MOBILITY. SAFETY. DESIGN. VISION5
At Vision5, our name is our methodology. We operate at the heart of the 5-Helix model, driving urban transformation by aligning the interests of Academia, Industry, Government, Civil Society, and the Environment. We believe that sustainable mobility only succeeds when all five forces move in the same direction.
What we do
From parking management policy to mobility plans, we provide the roadmap for sustainable development.
Through our road safety project, Close To, we tackle the root causes of road safety awareness and thereby foster a culture of personal responsibility.
Communication is and always will be the key to understanding. Our in-house agency COMMUNICAT develops sustainable strategies and campaigns that are tailored precisely to your needs.
We bridge the gap between theory and practice through specialized teaching and workshops.
Understanding the "why" to engineer the "how." We combine deep-dive qualitative research with robust quantitative analysis to anticipate future societal needs.
PROJECTS
NXTLVL ("NeXTLeVeL") Parking
Parking management as a key component of urban mobility strategies
The NXTLVL ("NeXTLeVeL") Parking project tackles the key challenge on how to promote and ensure efficient, green and sustainable urban mobility in the Central E...
Close To Austria
Risk prevention for novice drivers
The methodological and educational basis of the CLOSE TO prevention project is peer education, in which young people learn from one another. The CLOSE TO projec...
S-Bahn/RegioBahn/Regiobus
Strategic brand management for Verkehrsverbund Steiermark GmbH
The Styrian S-Bahn, RegioBahn and RegioBus is Styria’s flagship local transport project and entered service in 2007. The project was developed by the Province o...
News
VISION5 and the urban transformation
MANAGING CONFLICTS IN ROAD AND URBAN SPACES ON THE PATH TOWARDS THE 15-MINUTE CITY
In the DUT research project "Conflicted Streets," VISION5 is investigating the conflicts that arise when a municipality redesigns a street to promote the transport transition. The central question is not whether conflicts arise. After all, the differing demands of residents, commuters, and local business owners are usually not directly compatible with one another. The real question is what kind of conflicts they are: Is it truly about the use of public space? Or do the participants and affected parties interpret the existing facts in completely different ways? Or does the root cause of the conflict lie completely outside the actual redesign itself, grounded instead in values and life philosophies? The answers to these questions are essential for properly addressing conflicts and integrating them into the redesign process. One key takeaway is this: It is crucial to embrace conflicts and accept them for what they are.